facebook clothier turned angel investor soleio discusses how software design needs a ‘tool-pushed revolution’ and what makes layout teams and era startups a hit.
soleio is a software designer became investor. as a former fund supervisor and now angel investor, he has subsidized a number of the maximum successful tech startups of the previous few years together with figma, vanta, and vercel.
soleio has a heritage in design, consisting of paintings at facebook and dropbox wherein he led early layout efforts. i spoke to him approximately his stories designing for the early net, how a success era businesses method design, his involvement with figma and vercel, and how a profession in software program layout brought about a career in investing.
matthew tyson: as a programmer, i have to admit that design is something of a dark art to me. i realize exact layout whilst i encounter it, and i can construct all of the logical structures to returned it, but that’s it. can you inform me what a developer have to understand about true layout and how you advanced a ardour for it?
soleio: positive thing. i got my begin over my high college summers as an intern operating on an alumni magazine. that task added me to laptop publishing—the give up-to-cease method of developing with content material, producing visible and written media, then editing and laying all of it out for print.
my passion for layout sprang from studying and reverse-engineering the paintings of other human beings designing internet experiences. humans like joshua davis and dan cederholm.
in particular, i was fascinated with the emergence of net apps. on the time, it appeared that distributing software program via the browser turned into going to be the following huge segment of consumer era. after google introduced gmail, one of the earliest examples of this transition, i decided to move to san francisco to attempt my hand at being an unbiased dressmaker and developer.
tyson: you probably did loads of early design at fb. what turned into it like being part of that watershed second for the web?
soleio: facebook was the primary social media startup to look itself normally as a generation organization. as such, we centered on hiring very technical human beings. this included the early designers there, all of whom wrote production code and contributed directly to constructing the early merchandise.
our work as designers spanned the whole product development cycle from conceptualizing and prototyping early ideas, through growing and coding up features. we would frequently soar among product approach and structure discussions to excellent-tuning the visible ui design to proudly owning center elements of front-quit improvement. to my knowledge, we were the first startup to use the term “product design” within the context of making software program.
our view became that to be applicable in a fast and exceptionally technical subculture like fb’s, the design group needed to work intently with engineering to help anyone pass faster. i didn’t absolutely respect how uncommon that approach become returned when it changed into a long way greater common for groups to comply with a waterfall approach to product improvement.
we were designers who should deliver.
tyson: after fb you worked at dropbox, kind of transferring up to dealing with the design efforts. what become your transition to control like?
soleio: it become a choppy transition, to be sincere. whilst i began at dropbox complete-time, i used to be becoming a member of a startup that had already existed for 4 years. they had a pre-existing subculture and approach to product improvement and design.
furthermore, dropbox’s business success became a result of a very specific cost proposition to customers. human beings paid dropbox to preserve their maximum precious digital files safe. no one wanted to pay attention about “pass rapid and spoil matters” in that context—neither clients nor personnel!
this new work surroundings compelled me to confront some long-held assumptions about what drove the achievement of fb’s layout tradition and to cautiously consider what we had to foster at dropbox by way of comparison. it additionally supposed i needed to adapt to a crew that adhered to a unique set of values and sought management features that varied from what facebook rewarded. i had to navigate whilst to discard my previous reports and while to paste to my guns.
in all, it become a duration of fast personal growth and improvement. we made dropbox an attractive vicinity for designers to join, and we built an industry renowned group. if i made a listing of all of the individuals who designed for that business enterprise, it would comprise a who’s who of enterprise talent.
my experience at dropbox led me to a extra fashionable principle of what makes design groups and startups a success.
tyson: i agree with your first pass into making an investment become with figma, wherein you invested and acted as an guide. turned into that as an angel?
soleio: my begin as an investor truly started the year i left fb. shortly after my departure, i used to be approached by using a cohort of pals and co-workers who had additionally left the business enterprise and needed help recruiting designers for their own startups. all of them had the identical question: how did facebook do such a notable activity of hiring software program designers?
evidently i had sturdy reviews on the problem due to all of the time and electricity i had positioned toward design recruiting in my last few years there. layout hiring have become as essential to the agency’s success as product development. along the way i found a passion for expertise-spotting—locating exceptional designers in surprising places and persuading them to enroll in fb.
little did i realize, my conversations with these new founders on how to construct amazing layout teams brought about the second one act of my career: partnering with startups as an investor and advisor. in truth, dropbox turned into among my earliest investments. advising that group subsequently led to me joining full-time as head of design on the give up of 2012.
so what about figma? fast forward to 2014… i had the danger to host dylan field at dropbox headquarters for a conversation over lunch about his startup, which was nevertheless in stealth. dylan became introduced to me via dropbox coworker and dylan’s university classmate ryan kaplan.
dylan introduced his pc with him to the cafeteria and walked me thru a few zany webgl demos earlier than showing me the earliest prototypes for his or her new product—a collaborative, internet-primarily based layout editor.
i recall that conversation vividly because a pair of things locked into place in my head as dylan defined their plans.
first, i used to be personally grappling with the mission of coping with a large team that used two one of a kind tools for developing and handling design belongings, photoshop and the fledgling sketch app. this dichotomy caused plenty of redundant and pricey work.
2d, i felt that each photoshop and sketch had been essentially unmarried-participant tools and thus didn’t mirror how layout became truly carried out, that is collaboratively, as a crew game. a couple of designers often labored collectively in small teams on shared initiatives.
figma solved both of these troubles by using the present day internet browser to strength a actual-time, multiplayer revel in that became extra without difficulty to be had to people who worked with designers in addition to the designers themselves.
this become a consequential concept that wasn’t right now obvious to most people who made software program. i assumed figma should lead a tool-pushed revolution that would alternate how startups idea about and practiced layout.
the figma group nonetheless had a mountain of work in advance of them, however their ambition and strategy were too promising to ignore. i used to be fortunate to enroll in them as an investor and guide later that year. i helped the co-founders with hiring and mentoring the early designers. i also recommended the group on their preliminary product and pass-to-marketplace techniques—every now and then even playing the position of figma’s first design evangelist.
my paintings with figma cemented how i desired to paintings with startups going forward. i decided to leave my full-time function at dropbox and start a new career path as a complete-time investor. this felt like the right stage of abstraction in which to have an effect on the sphere of layout at the same time as helping more than one teams right away.
tyson: you are also an angel investor in vercel. i am a large fan of vercel. every time i installation an app to international infrastructure with one button click i smile in amazement. how did you come to work with them?
soleio: vercel is a glad instance of ways startup investing is in general a relationships career.
i first met guillermo rauch when dropbox become in talks to gather his preceding startup cloudup. his team came via our workplace for a round of interviews—however it felt as even though they had been comparing us as a lot as we had been comparing them.
in our first communication, guillermo and that i saw that we had been remarkably aligned on product philosophy and layout. he has impeccable flavor, a strong bias for motion, and a hacker’s mindset.
unfortunately, dropbox didn’t win that acquisition. however guillermo and that i agreed to remain in contact, and when he embarked on founding zeit (now vercel) some years later, i was thrilled to be one in every of his first angel checks.
i knew that guillermo become a founder who both valued layout and had a principled view on the way to build software program from his direct reviews as a developer. he’s a conventional instance of ways clear questioning is often the precursor to outstanding design and innovation.
tyson: startup investing is more often than not a relationships career—very interesting!
i have to ask now, what is your making an investment philosophy or approach? how do you discover and examine these extremely good agencies?
soleio: despite the fact that i’m now 10 years into this line of labor, i still feel as even though i’m very early in my practice. so i reserve the proper to evolve my questioning here!
these days i in general care approximately listening to how founders think about their competitive method and how this method translates right into a enterprise roadmap. it calls for founders to articulate each a considerable marketplace possibility and capability pathways to developing and taking pictures the lion’s percentage of value.
some investors see this as an workout in trouble-locating and answer-building. but i see it extra as an workout in accumulating and wielding energy.
a successful strategy can’t appear on the rate of customers or commercial enterprise partners, nor via sheer attempt by myself. at its coronary heart, a aggressive approach ought to be a vision and a plan for long-term price advent in a dynamic world. a plan to win massive that also takes full stock of one’s current talents and function within the market.
tyson: this tweet is a kind of call to palms approximately identity, design, and new on line communities. can you increase on it? is there a hint closer to a web3 identity here?
soleio: i’ve a working theory that more on line groups could exist if human beings had simpler access to alternative identities than their irl selves. this is one of the massive limiting factors for the way thoughts and relationships get formed these days. the obvious reality of the matter is that an awful lot of the sector’s understanding is still bound up interior closed communities. increasing the quantity and get right of entry to to on line communities could have a exquisite impact on what we are able to study and attain.
i see this much less as a web3 development and greater of a natural evolution for the internet going forward—particularly in the run-as much as spatial computing (ar/vr) going mainstream. how we present in immersive, virtual worlds need to look and feature very in a different way from how we present inside the real international.
i’m excited to have subsidized one particular startup that has a captivating attitude on what kind of product experience may unlock this latent possibility. i’ll percentage more after they’re prepared to.